Original articles

Nuchal Translucency (NT) as a method of First Trimester Screening for Aneuploidy

Poovangela Naidoo

Abstract


Objective
To determine the effectiveness of nuchal translucency screening in predicting aneuploidy and structural abnormalities in a South African population
Study design
Descriptive Study
Setting
Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital Fetal Medicine Unit
Outcome measures
An adjusted risk was derived from the combination of maternal age-related risk and the risk derived from nuchal translucency screening. A positive screen was denoted by an adjusted risk of more than 1/300 and a negative screen by an adjusted risk of less than 1/300. In order to determine the number of undiagnosed abnormalities in the group, all babies were examined by a paediatrician at birth to detect and describe dysmorphic features.
Results
A total of 428 patients underwent first trimester screening between July 2003 and July 2005. Three percent were lost to follow up. Of the 415 cases analyzed, 57 patients screened positive and 356 patients screened negative. The mean age for both groups of patients was 30.1 years. Of the 57 patients that screened positive 24 elected to have chorionic villus sampling (CVS). This resulted in the detection of 6 chromosomal abnormalities and 2 structural abnormalities. Among the remaining 356 patients, who had screened negative, 2 had an increase in the adjusted risk when the risk was compared to the background risk, and one chromosomal abnormality was detected in this group; 8 elected to have CVS because of a previous history of a chromosomal abnormality and there were no abnormalities among them.
Conclusions
The use of these screening methods has enabled prenatal karyotyping to become cost effective, and to allow concentration on pregnancies at highest risk for chromosomal abnormalities, regardless of age.

Author's affiliations

Poovangela Naidoo, Chris Hani Baragwanath Hospital

Full Text

PDF (239KB)

Keywords

First trimester screening, Down's syndrome screening; nuchal translucency

Cite this article

South African Medical Journal 2008;98(4):295.

Article History

Date submitted: 2007-06-07
Date published: 2008-04-09

Article Views

Abstract views: 2444
Full text views: 1893

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here