Research

A two-step quality-improvement intervention to address Pap smear quality at public health facilities in South Africa

M Mulongo, A M Oberlin, C Firnhaber, B Goeieman, S Ramotshela, P Michelow, S Jordaan, C J Chibwesha

Abstract


Background. The endocervical component of a Pap smear is an important indicator of sample quality – or ‘adequacy’. However, only 6 of 52 districts in South Africa (SA) meet the Department of Health (DoH) performance benchmark: a 70% adequacy rate. We implemented a quality-improvement (QI) intervention to address suboptimal Pap smear quality in Tshwane District, Gauteng Province, SA.

Objectives. To determine whether training with the wooden Ayre spatula (step 1) or introduction of the cytobroom (step 2) resulted in greater improvements in Pap smear adequacy rates.

Methods. Two Tshwane District health facilities participated in our QI project between May 2016 and February 2017. In step 1, staff received training on the Ayre spatula. In step 2, the spatula was replaced with the cytobroom. Pap smear volumes, adequacy rates and results are reported for the pre-intervention period and after each QI step. We compared adequacy rates using Fisher’s exact test, with a significance level of p=0.05.

Results. In the pre-intervention period, 304 of 965 Pap smears were deemed adequate (32%; 95% confidence interval (CI) 29 - 35%). After step 1, the proportion increased to 109 of 191 (57%; 95% CI 50 - 64%; p<0.01). Similarly, after step 2, the proportion increased to 155 of 192 (81%; 95% CI 74 - 86%; p<0.01). The proportion of abnormal smears increased from 13% before the QI intervention to 17% after step 1 and 22% after step 2.

Conclusion. Although training in Pap smear collection using the Ayre spatula resulted in modest improvements in quality, facilities only achieved the DoH benchmark of a 70% adequacy rate after the introduction of the cytobroom.


Authors' affiliations

M Mulongo, Right to Care, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

A M Oberlin, Division of Global Women’s Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC; and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion, Aurora, CO, USA

C Firnhaber, Right to Care, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Division of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine, University of Colorado, Anschutz Outpatient Pavilion, Aurora, CO, USA

B Goeieman, Right to Care, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

S Ramotshela, Right to Care, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa

P Michelow, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; and Cytology Unit, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa

S Jordaan, Department of Anatomical Pathology, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg; and Cytology Unit, National Health Laboratory Service, Johannesburg, South Africa

C J Chibwesha, Right to Care, Helen Joseph Hospital, Johannesburg, South Africa; and Division of Global Women’s Health, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, NC, USA

Full Text

PDF (132KB)

Keywords

Cervical cancer; Pap smear; Quality improvement

Cite this article

South African Medical Journal 2018;108(11):926-928. DOI:10.7196/SAMJ.2018.v108i11.13153

Article History

Date submitted: 2018-10-26
Date published: 2018-10-26

Article Views

Abstract views: 1242
Full text views: 709

Comments on this article

*Read our policy for posting comments here